My name is Satheesh Sangaraju, and I am writing this article on the topic “Quality Control Check” in filing MCA with the purpose of raising public awareness about a serious concern that has come to light through our experience.
The background
An inaccurate DPT-3 filing was submitted by a professional. We had shared the duly signed DPT-3 form with the concerned professional (CA P. Kalyan Kumar) for filing on the MCA portal. However, upon later verification, we discovered that an incorrect or unrelated document was uploaded in place of the actual DPT-3 form.
Does QC (Quality Control) Check in MCA Filings?
While the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) would be the authority to officially answer this question, I would like to present our analysis based on our experience.
The MCA does not perform a detailed “Quality Control (QC)” check of eForm fields or attachments at the time of filing. This is important to highlight because, as a software professional, one might reasonably assume that such a system would include validation mechanisms to ensure the accuracy and correctness of the information submitted.
However, our findings indicate otherwise. The system primarily checks for format compliance and digital signatures, but it does not verify whether the content of the uploaded documents is accurate or appropriate.
The following document we have sent:
We have sent him (CA P. Kalyan Kumar) the following document.
Found an inaccurate document in MCA system :
Following is the document we have found in MCA System in place of our actual DPT-3. It is important to note that this discovery was made after we had already terminated the services of “CA P. Kalyan Kumar” due to a separate issue related to filing in the reporting portal (SFT). – refer https://inforidgeit.com/the-biggest-ever-technical-issue-in-reporting-portal/.
Real Issue
The following are our authorized directors list and same in MCA master data.
We do not know how form is validated others signatures other than our company directors, and how its accurate and the form is some other unknown company INC-20 in place of our company DPT-3.
Isn’t it serious security issue from MCA? Shouldn’t MCA enforce at least a minimum level of document validation?
Refer other serious issue in MCA ( https://inforidgeit.com/is-mca-design-secured/)
In modern digital governance systems, it’s expected that basic field checks, or content field validations be in place to prevent completely unrelated or incorrect uploads.
In many countries, regulatory portals:
- Prevent uploading files with unrelated names or formats.
- Require pre-validation by professionals or pre-screening.
Why invalid document submitted?
In our analysis we have found documents overriding/replacement biggest issue. First they submits invalid document (they means who intended to misuse), whenever opportunity favorable to them then replace their intended document.
There is a possibility that document overriding/replacement in MCA, we do not know how it’s going to happen, whether directly from MCA dashboard with professional user accounts or from ROC side. We have exposed it in article https://inforidgeit.com/is-mca-design-secured/
A Cautionary Note for Business Owners: When discussing your company’s financial affairs with auditors, bank managers, or other professional service providers, exercise discretion and healthy skepticism. Relying too heavily on—or sharing more detail than necessary with—these advisors can expose you to unnecessary risks.
Stay away from “CA P KALYAN KUMAR”, a chain of network is there who misusing compliance process and technical issues in MCA. Even they are threatening professionally and personally. Following are his and his associated contact details. Stay away from https://vakilsearch.com / https://zolvit.com
https://vakilsearch.com. https://www.zolvit.com/
https://www.linkedin.com/company/pkkandco/about
https://www.linkedin.com/in/parth-shah-94704135
CAUTION
Read very interesting facts about Digital Audio Forgery
I understand that fear often prevents people from openly sharing information about such large fraud networks. Many individuals hesitate to speak out because they worry about potential consequences, influence, or retaliation from powerful groups behind these operations. However, staying silent only allows these networks to grow stronger and continue exploiting unsuspecting citizens. By bringing these issues to light and raising collective awareness, we can break the cycle of fear, protect others from falling victim, and push for accountability against those who misuse their power for fraudulent purposes.
My purpose in sharing this is to create awareness among the public about how fraud networks operate and engage with individuals without their knowledge. Many people may not even realize they are interacting with fake callers or fraudsters until it is too late, by which time their personal information or recorded responses may already have been misused. It is therefore essential to remain vigilant, verify every communication, and recognize these deceptive tactics before falling victim. Such networks may be supported by powerful interests, including political groups or large companies engaged in malpractice. Only widespread public awareness and caution can help put an end to these practices.